Search

Epc Umbrella Agreement

Epc Umbrella Agreement

In a case recently decided by the High Court in England and Wales – Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago Ltd v Samsung Engineering Trinidad Co Ltd [2017] EWHC 3055 (TCC) – an employer conducted arbitration proceedings by incorrectly referring to the land contract and the price of the onshore contract. This meant that the contractor was entitled, under the framework contract, to a floor for damages liquidated on the basis of 10% of the land contract price, excluding the combined prices of the contracts. This means that the developer has actually been placed in a less favourable position as a result of the shared contract structure. If the court were to introduce the ceiling of the liaison agreement into the land agreement, the lower ceiling would be totally inoperative. The lower ceiling is fair and the ceiling of the liaison agreement must be interpreted as a “permanent limit for the sum of damages liquidated under the three agreements.” As a general rule, contracting parties can expect a higher overall ceiling in a liaison agreement to end any lower liability ceiling set in onshore and offshore agreements. The reason is that any delay is usually due to the consolidated scope and not to the various onshore or offshore elements. These elements are a bit artificial to make tax sharing effective. Among these parties, the case also confirmed a number of safeguard measures that would generally include well-informed parties in a divided contractual structure. The Court of Arbitration found that the ceiling set in the onshore agreement applied and found in Samsung`s favour. Petronin challenged the finding in the High Court of England.

The Court of Justice agreed that the lower ceiling was correct and rejected Petronine`s argument to the contrary. The main reasons for this decision were as follows. In Petronin`s counter-action, there was “a 10% cap on the contract price.” The “contract price” was a defined term that describes the price in the land agreement. The total price for both onshore and offshore elements was defined in the liaison agreement as “total contract amount.” It is tempting to say that the liability ceiling should be distributed in this way beyond contracts: land liability is limited to 100% of the land price; Similarly, liability at sea is limited to 100% of the offshore price and total liability under the framework contract is limited to 100% of the total amount of offshore/onshore prices.


Comments are closed.
error: Copy Protected