Search

Barrett Self-Enforcing International Environmental Agreements

Barrett Self-Enforcing International Environmental Agreements

Finus M (2004) International cooperation to solve international pollution problems. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper Osmani D, Tol RSJ (2007) Towards farsighted stable international environmental agreements: part one. Hamburg University Working Papers, FNU-140 Abstract: Effective management of international environmental resources requires cooperation and, in practice, cooperation is generally codified in International Environmental Agreements (EEA). The essential characteristic of the ESAs is that they cannot be imposed by third parties. This paper examines the properties of IAEs that self-force using two models. One of them sets the number of signatories, the terms of the agreement and the actions of the non-signatories. In the other, the IEA is modeled as an infinitely repeated game, but assured of renegotiation. Both models suggest that IEAs can do little to improve non-cooperative outcomes when the number of countries sharing the resource is large. Copyright 1994 by the Royal Economic Society. Swanson T, Johnston S (1999) Global environmental problems and international environmental agreements: the economics of international institution building.

Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA Hoel M, Schneider K (1997) Incitations à la participation à un traité international sur l`environnement. Environ Resour Econ 9(2): 153–170 Folmer H, van Mouche P, Ragland S (1993) Jeux interconnectés et problèmes environnementaux internationaux. Environ Resour Econ 3(4): 313-335. doi:10.1007/BF00418815 Chandler P, Tulkens H (1997) The core of an economy with multilateral ecological externalities. Int J Game Theory 26(3): 379–401 Oberthur S (1998) The International convention for the regulation of whaling: from over-exploitation to total prohibition. Yearbook of International Cooperation on Environment and Development. Earthscan Publishers, London Kolstad C (2007) Systematic uncertainty in the self-application of international environmental agreements. J Environ Econ Manage 53 (1): 68-79. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2006.08.001 Barrett S (1997a) The strategy of trade sanctions in international environmental agreements. Resour Energy Econ 19(1): 345-361.

doi:10.1016/S0928-7655 (97)00016-X Ulph A (2004) Stable international environmental agreements with a stock of pollutants, insecurity and learning. J Uncertain risk 29(1): 53-73 doi:10.1023/B:RISK.0000031445.13939.e4 Barrett S (2003) Environment and state art: the strategy for designing environmental contracts. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York Botteon M, Carraro C (1998) Strategies for environmental negotiations: issue linkage with heterogeneous countries. Dans Hanley N, Folmer H (eds) Game Theory and the Environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK und Northampton, MA Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1998) International environmental agreements: incentives and political economy. Eur Econ Rev 42(3–5): 561–572. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00118-9 Barrett S (1998a) Über die Theorie und Diplomatie der Erstellung von Umweltabkommen. Environ Resour Econ 11(1): 317–333. doi:10.1023/A:1008243528330 Barrett S (1997b) Heterogene internationale Umweltabkommen. Dans: Carraro Carlo(eds) Négociations environnementales internationales. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK und Northampton, MA Chandler P, Tulkens H (1995) A core-theoretic solution for the design of cooperative agreements on transfrontier pollution. Int Tax Public Finance 2(2): 279-293.

doi:10.1007/BF00877502 Wagner UJ (2001) La conception d’accords environnementaux internationaux stables: théorie économique et économie politique. J Econ Surv 15(3): 377-411. doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00143 Macho-Stadler I, Perez-Castrillo D (2006) Optimal company policy and emissions and compliance with environmental taxes. . . .


Comments are closed.
error: Copy Protected